Using accuser’s name humiliates Greitens’ victim. And now we’re talking about her sexual history?

MISSOURI
The Kansas City Star

BY MELINDA HENNEBERGER
mhenneberger@kcstar.com

May 10, 2018

Remember back in the bad old days, when the names of sex crime victims were made public? Earlier this week in Missouri, for instance.

On Wednesday, Judge Rex Burlison, the judge in the felony invasion of privacy case against Gov. Eric Greitens, ruled that the full name of the woman whose privacy he’s accused of invading can be used in court. She never asked for this, yet her privacy is being invaded all over again.

Burlison has yet to rule whether her sexual history may also be pawed over during the trial, which saw jury selection begin Thursday. It’s hard to know what purpose taking out her history and tossing it around in public could serve — Hey, look at this one! — beyond humiliating her even more.

A simple but highly effective method of shutting women up — and you know, the classics are rarely anything fancy — it’s a problem that this throwback move is even being considered.

Note: This is an Abuse Tracker excerpt. Click the title to view the full text of the original article. If the original article is no longer available, see our News Archive.