CALIFORNIA
A Room with a Pew
PAUL FERICANO
“Wherever there is a human being, there is an opportunity for a kindness.”
— Seneca
On January 12, the 165 friars that make up the Franciscan Province of St. Barbara in California overwhelmingly elected a new provincial, David Gaa. Their choice not only signified the most hopeful sign of change in the province since the clergy abuse crisis of 1993, but it also brought an end to seven years of autocratic rule. Make no mistake: the Franciscans are poised to do a complete 180 in the ways that count most. And while the friars would never admit to it publicly, it’s clear that Gaa’s election is a compassionate but firm repudiation of former provincial John Hardin’s divisive policies. The suffering people of this province, friars and laypersons alike, could not feel more grateful if St. Francis himself had kneeled and washed their feet.
The evidence supporting this new direction was overwhelming. Many Franciscans felt angry, frustrated, and weary with the management style and spiritual path of their order. Their votes last week reflected this as plainly as their hopes for the future. Not only did they elect a new provincial with strong reconciliation and pastoral credentials who, for years, worked as a missionary in the Ukraine and the American southwest, but they also chose a vicar provincial, Martin Ibarra, with equally sound pastoral skills who has spent the last several years ministering to the poorest of the poor in Mexico. These are the top two men the friars have chosen to lead them into a brighter light. And to ensure their success, they elected a slate of six new definitor friars (Garrett Galvin, Anthony Garibaldi, John Gutierrez, Dan Lackie, Bill Minkel and Joe Schwab), the majority of whom have a long history of engaging in pastoral and social justice work.
Dissatisfaction among the friars has been smoldering for quite some time. Over the past few years, private conversations have revealed a deep displeasure with some of their “misfit brothers” (as one friar put it kindly). If I sometimes challenged them to take action I was often met with silence. One can argue that a sense of helplessness kept the friars from publicly speaking out. But their oath of allegiance actually contributed to their own suffering and, more to the point, to the unnecessary suffering of others. Repressive vows of obedience shackled these men to an antiquated rule that ultimately allowed others to distort the order’s principles and to abuse their power. Does this sound familiar? We saw these same tactics employed during the worst years of the abuse crisis. As a result, the unhealthy environment that one outgoing administration created will long be remembered as one of the most regressive leaderships on record and one of the least Franciscan in spirit. The irony here would be woefully tragic if it weren’t so absurd. And perhaps it’s a bit of both.
Note: This is an Abuse Tracker excerpt. Click the title to view the full text of the original article. If the original article is no longer available, see our News Archive.