MINNESOTA
Canonical Consultation
03/09/2015
Jennifer Haselberger
On December 12, 2013, Archbishop Nienstedt met with the priests of one of the geographic deaneries in the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis. The purpose of the meeting was for the priests to be able to share with the Archbishop their thoughts on what was then a blossoming sexual abuse crisis in the Archdiocese. Unbeknownst to the Archbishop, or to Bishop Piche (who accompanied him to the meeting), the conversation was being secretly recorded. Within days the recording had made its way to the news media and to law enforcement, and the unguarded statements of the two bishops would become important pieces of information as various organizations attempted to put together who knew what and when. To this day, neither the transcript nor the full recording of that meeting has been made public.
Perhaps not surprising, one of the first questions that was raised by a member of the deanery at the meeting with the Archbishop had to do with the Kinsale file review. Priests, even at that particular moment, questioned what Kinsale was looking for in the files, and wanted to know what the mandate of the review team was. They also wanted to know what standards were being applied in terms of the credibility of accusations and the types of incidents that would be identified as concerns.
After defending the decision to hire Kinsale, the Archbishop made the following statement:
‘In terms of what they’re looking for, they have an eye for misconduct, and I think, I can’t say for sure because I do rely on Susan Mulharen and Joe Kueppers in terms of the kind of levels of misconduct they would be looking at, but my understanding is that anything that really stood out, they would bring that to my attention and I would have to weigh that. If it seems substantial, and I would be weighing that with Bishop Piche and Bishop Cozzens and Father Lachowitzer, and if it was of substance, then we would have to talk to the priest about it. If it had something to do with the Charter [for the Protection of Children and Young People], and I don’t believe that there… I think you saw the people who have violated the Charter in the disclosure that we did last week. If it had to do with other kind of misconduct, that would go to the Ministerial Standards Board which has been formed now. And then we would allow them to make a recommendation to me. But certainly the priest–. I mean, I am, I am on your side. And it hurts me whenever we have to take steps against a priest because I, like you, hold the priesthood in such esteem, but we’re just living in this atmosphere now that it’s, I think in order to re-establish credibility, we have to be able to say we don’t have anyone in ministry who is a danger to children or to vulnerable adults.’
Note: This is an Abuse Tracker excerpt. Click the title to view the full text of the original article. If the original article is no longer available, see our News Archive.