UNITED STATES
Christian Catholicism
Jerry Slevin
* Two of Pope Francis’ key cardinals, George Pell, new Vatican financial czar, and Sean O’Malley, new Vatican anti-abuse czar, have now shown us why Francis’ reform efforts will falter fast. Pell has shown this by his “admissions”; O’Malley has shown it by his “omissions”. The fundamental procedural weakness, in effect, highlighted by both these Cardinals’ inadequate approaches, is the continuing unaccountable control over both these scandal prone areas by a “supreme and infallible pontiff”, a pope, and his secretively selected Cardinals and other cronies, it appears.
* Pope Francis may be doing the best he can, given his strong opponents. He seems to be; but it does not appear that this will be enough to save the Vatican, as discussed in detail below. And his successor will not likely be any more successful. It is now or never for the Vatican, from most indications. Recent reports indicate Francis was picked by one faction of Cardinals, but that may not have been enough to empower him to succeed over competing factions. Please see:
* [Catholic News Agency]
* First, Pell’s admissions, which are contained in a article Pell wrote (12/4) seemingly to try to “sell as the solution” the Vatican’s new financial management structure. Unwittingly, it appears that Pell’s sales pitch has instead shown why the financial “reforms” cannot succeed in effectively ending Vatican financial mismanagement and corruption. Please see Pell’s revealing article at:
* [Catholic Herald]
* Concerning why the Vatican has had so many notorious major financial scandals, Pell indicated: “Those in the Curia were following long-established patterns. Just as kings had allowed their regional rulers, princes or governors an almost free hand, provided they balanced their books, so too did the popes with the curial cardinals (as they still do with diocesan bishops).” So, it appears, the key problem is the papal monarchical structure. …
* It seems quite clear that Pope Francis is intentionally pursuing effective child protection reform measures very slowly, at best, and almost secretly with this new advisory committee (A) headed by Cardinal Law’s successor, Cardinal O’Malley, who is well experienced with “handling” abuse investigations secretively and slowly, and (B) aided now, as top staffer, by Fr. Robert Oliver, who has been successively Cardinals Law’s, O’Malley’s and Mueller’s predictable and seemingly pliable longtime canon lawyer. Fr. Geisenger now is serving now as the Vatican’s “top cop”, succeeding Fr. Oliver in that position. Priests presumably will like this “priest friendly” lineup more than innocent children and their parents will, I suspect.
* Twelve years after the Boston Globe Catholic priest child abuse revelations and almost 30 years after Father Thomas Doyle’s abuse report to Cardinals Law, Levada, Bevilacqua, Laghi, et al. and Pope John Paul II, for O’Malley to say on CBS we are looking into “protocols” is evidently a farce. And O’Malley seems to have gotten away with it with many in the media so far!
* I have to wonder, as an international lawyer, if O’Malley, Oliver and Geisinger, all presumably US citizens, were picked to work on the latest papal public relations ploys to “do little or nothing” to really curtail clerical abuse also because the US has not ratified the International Criminal Court (ICC) Treaty.
* Since the ex-pope had already been a subject of a complaint filed with the ICC, it must have occurred to the Vatican and its lawyers that whomever handles these matters can expect to face a further complaint at the ICC, a very serious matter. It might be more difficult to prosecute them under the ICC Treaty as US citizens if they had returned to the USA when the ICC prosecutor finally pursues the Vatican again, as I am confident as an international lawyer she will.
Note: This is an Abuse Tracker excerpt. Click the title to view the full text of the original article. If the original article is no longer available, see our News Archive.