BishopAccountability.org
 
  High Court Won't Interfere with Subpoenas

By Toni Locy
The Associated Press, carried in Monterey Herald
April 17, 2006

http://www.montereyherald.com/mld/montereyherald
/news/breaking_news/14361719.htm

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Monday refused to interfere in a California prosecutor's efforts to obtain confidential counseling records kept by the Catholic Church on two priests under investigation for molesting children.

The justices, without comment, declined to hear the church's appeal of a state court ruling that permitted the Los Angeles district attorney to subpoena records generated by the bishop and the priests in dealing with concerns about child sexual abuse.

The subpoenas are significant because similar records are being sought in hundreds of lawsuits filed by sexual abuse victims across the nation. According to the church's filing, counseling records are being sought in more than 500 victims' lawsuits in California alone.

The 14 documents sought in the DA's investigation include letters to and from the bishop and the priests, along with details from their confessions and treatment.

The church had argued the subpoenas violate the First Amendment's protection of religion, saying "state review of confidential, pastoral counseling ... inherently entangles the state in the internal religious life of churches and intrudes into religious practice."

Lawyers for the church also said the subpoenas will "chill" the relationship between the bishop and each of the priests. The case already has had an impact, they said. Instead of counseling, priests are hiring lawyers and refusing to undergo psychological evaluations, the church's lawyers said.

Steve Cooley, LA County's district attorney, said the issue is not whether the bishop is performing a religious practice by counseling priests. It's whether a crime has been committed against children, he wrote in a court filing.

"The criminal laws are neutral as concerns religion," Cooley wrote. "Investigation of these crimes is no more invasive of a religious institution than of an educational institution or a health institution."

The case is the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 05-1017.

 
 

Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution.