Godsent/Goddamn Gustavo
Letters to the Editor
Orange County Weekly
August 26, 2004
http://www.ocweekly.com/columns/letters/letters/19647/
[See also other
articles by Gustavo Arellano.]
Thank you for writing this incredible article [Gustavo Arellano’s
"Army
of God," Aug. 13]. I honestly believe that you are a huge part
of the healing process for the individuals in the article, as well as
all victims of church abuse. What a shame the church has let it come to
this.
As someone who grew up watching "Father Hollywood" captivating
the laity at Mass and the kids swarming him at Mater Dei High School football
games and someone who knows personally of [the] reasons for [Michael Harris’]
removal from Santa Margarita Catholic High School, I am thoroughly disgusted.
Let’s not shame the protesters; let’s shame the church. They
are at fault here, not the victims. If the church goes bankrupt in the
process, SO BE IT! AMEN, AMEN!
Jamie Dugan
Aliso Viejo
I have been following the Catholic Church’s sex-abuse scandal since
it erupted, and I have to say that Arellano’s piece was one of the
finest articles I’ve read regarding this sensitive issue. He presented
those men with balance and considered observation, making them come alive
to the reader for their purposeful drive to see justice done for those
hurt kids (still) residing within adult bodies.
And when we finally write the comprehensive story of this horrific time
in the American Catholic Church, I want the American press to be credited
with bringing our awareness of these crimes through this kind of reportage.
As far as I’m concerned, reporters like Gustavo are the best things
that ever happened to these abused kids.
Rita Mignacca
Albany, New York
Excellent writing and reporting. I’m not a Catholic and not a sex-abuse
victim, but I pray the victims will recover and the Catholic Church will
heal itself instead of attempting to impose its will upon the world. Articles
such as yours can only be helpful to all.
Roslyn Manley
Irvine
Congratulations. Your article will toughen the hearts and lives of many
struggling Catholics. God bless you.
Debby Bodkin
Aliso Viejo
Re: Bishop Brown’s humble hut [Gustavo Arellano’s "Movin'
On Up," Aug. 13]: this is one narcissistic pig.
Anonymous
via e-mail
I sit here thinking, how to begin? Gustavo, you have the audacity to paint
Christianity and Christians with an outrageously broad brush, characterizing
us as abortion-clinic bombers and KKK members [Letters, Aug. 20]? What
kind of bigoted crap is that? Should all Mexicans be seen as gangbangers
running drugs, killing cops and scurrying back to Mexico to hide? Should
all Islamic folks be characterized as plane-hijacking, murderous thugs,
intent on killing all American infidels? Of course not. This kind of blatant
hate and lashing out illustrates your bloated Leftist ignorance. Christians
do all kinds of charity, but you choose to look at Christianity through
prejudiced eyes.
B. Dirk Yarborough
Costa Mesa
Gustavo Arellano’s article "Nuestra
Seņora de Censorship" [Aug. 20] is based on inaccurate information
obtained from the website La Voz de Aztlán. Gustavo never contacted
me, our guest curator or any museum representative regarding the "Virgin
of Guadalupe" exhibit. I was contacted briefly by Ray Beltrán
[the story researcher], and I sent him information indicating the La Voz
stories were inaccurate. Had Gustavo researched this issue, he would have
discovered there is no story nor any "controversy" surrounding
the work of Alma López and her participation in our upcoming exhibit.
To clarify a few of the statements made in the article:
We have never "censored" the selections of our guest curator,
Lynn LaBate, nor have we censored the work of Alma López. The piece
María de Los Angeles was selected months ago by LaBate
for inclusion in the exhibit. During the time she was researching possible
artwork for the exhibit, she considered several of Ms. López’s
works, as well as works by numerous other artists. She eventually selected
María de Los Angeles as the piece that best fit the curatorial
themes in the exhibit. Again, based on the theme of the exhibit, Our
Lady was not one of the works considered for the upcoming exhibit.
Regarding Gustavo’s statement that "there would be no naked
Virgins" in our exhibit, we have never had any discussion, agreement
or any other communications with the Diocese of Orange or anyone else
regarding this matter. I am not aware that any naked Virgin of Guadalupe
images were proposed for our exhibit.
The Catholic Church never "went nuts" over any aspect of the
exhibit. The representatives of the Catholic Church have never attempted
to influence the works selected for the exhibit.
Mr. Arellano states that "it’s no stretch then to figure that
Soto’s opposition to Our Lady played a role in its exclusion."
Obviously, since Our Lady was never considered for the exhibit,
there was no "opposition" by Bishop Soto, no "exclusion"
by the museum, etc. Bishop Soto is among a group of community advisers
who have assisted us in producing the exhibit.
Joe Felz
Director, Fullerton Museum Center
www.ci.fullerton.ca.us/museum
Gustavo Arellano responds: The "Virgin of Guadalupe:
Interpreting Devotion" is likely to be one of the most important
exhibits in the local arts scene. Bravo to Joe and his colleagues for
putting it together. That said, Joe’s letter is laden with inaccuracies,
but one of them stands out: his claim that Our Lady was never
considered for the exhibit is something only the most credulous could
accept. It raises (yet again) the question of censorship and, maybe (let
me say this gently), curatorial judgment: I mean, really, why not even
consider showing what is arguably the most famous reinterpretation of
the Virgin of Guadalupe? The claim is belied by Joe’s own Aug. 2
e-mail to Fullerton city officials, a communication in which he declared
Our Lady "controversial," compared it unfavorably to
the "in no way derogatory" Maria de Los Angeles, and
assured the officials that his advisory board includes Catholics. With
or without Our Lady, when the exhibit opens, I’ll be among
the first in line. Hope I get in.
|