Our view: State falls short on abuse reform
Echo Pilot
November 25, 2019
https://bit.ly/37EkqXd
The 2018 release of state Attorney General Josh Shapiro’s grand jury report exposing decades of Roman Catholic clergy child sexual abuse offered state lawmakers the opportunity to level a gross imbalance of power and speed justice to damaged victims.
They failed to deliver in full.
Landmark legislation guaranteed to protect future victims is heading to Gov. Tom Wolf’s desk to be signed into law.
The state Senate on Wednesday advanced reforms recommended by the state grand jurors who uncovered, through church records and wrenching testimony, the sexual abuse of more than 1,000 victims by more than 300 clergy in six Pennsylvania Roman Catholic dioceses, including the Catholic Diocese of Erie.
The bills eliminate the statute of limitations for filing criminal child sex abuse charges and give future victims until the age of 55 to sue for damages. They clarify penalties for failures to report abuse and prohibit confidentiality agreements that bar victims from reporting crimes. That is monumental, as state Rep. Mark Rozzi, of Berks County, a priest abuse survivor and reform champion, noted.
But when it comes to the grand jury recommendation that victims be given a time window to sue the church retroactively, those victims who want to confront their abusers independently and transparently in a court of law again must wait.
With that recommendation staunchly opposed by Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati of Jefferson County and church and insurance lobbyists, lawmakers instead voted to seek a constitutional amendment that would allow victims time to sue retroactively.
That process could take years and its outcome is uncertain. And if it happens, the church’s exposure will be lessened.
Many victims, amid the legislative uncertainty powered by Scarnati and like-minded lobbyists, opted to take advantage of the brief window offered them to negotiate settlements with the church, presided over by independent panels.
Scarnati said the push for a constitutional amendment on Wednesday addressed his primary concern that legislation opening that two-year window to sue would violate the state Constitution.
Yet a year ago, the senator said he would be willing to “hold my nose” and vote to open a two-year window for victims to sue – but only individual perpetrators and not the deep-pocketed institution that enabled the abuse.
So it is with very mixed feelings that we greet this outcome. The bills muster historic, consequential redress by giving key rights to future victims.
Yet the fight over victims’ right to sue retroactively has served so far to reiterate the scandal’s defining wrong – placing the interests of the church above child victims’. It has stalled justice for those who want to seek it in court and afforded the church the power to decide the consequences of its crimes itself, a dynamic tired and painfully familiar.
|