The
Legacy of St. John Paul II: This Is Leadership?!
By William D. Lindsey Bilgrimage April 27,
2014 http://bilgrimage.blogspot.com/2014/04/the-legacy-of-st-john-paul-ii-this-is.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2FOPqpQ+%28Bilgrimage%29
As I continue reading about the preparations for tomorrow's
canonization of Popes John XXIII and John Paul II, I keep
thinking — I'll be honest — This is
leadership? I'm not referring specifically to the two popes
as I ask that question.
I'm referring quite specifically to the legacy of the John
Paul II era in my church: This is leadership? How
can I possibly read the following stories and not ask that
question — how can I read these stories and fail to ask
what the saint-to-be did to my church as he set into place top
pastoral leaders who are offering the church the kind of
leadership that is critically dissected (and with very good
reason) in the following articles?
1. At
Wild Reed, Michael Bayly calls on St. Paul-Minneapolis
archbishop John Nienstedt to resign, after Nienstedt's
recent deposition was published and showed him to be either
"astoundingly inept" (Michael's words) in handling
abuse cases in his archdiocese, or mystifyingly oblivious. Over
and over, Nienstedt testified that he just didn't know,
couldn't remember, was fuzzy about the details of this or
that.
But as Michael points
out, all the while that Nienstedt claims he was just not
informed about or aware of salient facts wildly important to
those concerned about young people who were being or who might
be sexually molested by priests under his episcopal charge,
there was this going on — he was leading his flock in the
following quite specific way:
From the very start of his tenure as archbishop (in fact, even
well before he was appointed
coadjutor archbishop) John Nienstedt has been obsessed with
demonizing consensual sexual relationships between same-sex
couples and working to ensure that such relationships are in no
way legally acknowledged or recognized. In terms of the latter,
he has failed completely. The anti-gay "marriage
amendment," which he tirelessly
championed, was defeated
and, shortly after, both the Minnesota House and Senate passed
marriage equality legislation. Same-sex couples now
have the same civil right to marry as opposite-sex couples.
During the often contentious marriage amendment "battle,"
many Minnesota Catholics opposed
Nienstedt's anti-gay
activism. In 2013 they celebrated
the victory of marriage equality in the civil sphere.
Here's the crux of the matter: The time and energy
that Nienstedt expended on demonizing gay relationships and
attempting to deny such relationships legal recognition in
civil law, could and should have been focused instead on
creating a local church reflective of gospel values, including
confronting and dealing with the many issues relating to clergy
sex abuse within the archdiocese; issues, which Nienstedt
openly admits in his deposition, he was "out of the
loop" about (emphasis in original).
This is leadership?! Not knowing, not appearing to care
about, the fact that priests under a bishop's direct charge
are sexually violating minors, while obsessing about expensive,
futile, self-defeating, embarrassing "battles" against
people seeking the same civil right to marry that other
citizens enjoy?
This is leadership?! —this bitter culture-war
legacy of the pope who will be canonized tomorrow, which has
brought the Catholic church into such richly deserved disrepute
in the public square, as our pastoral leaders strain the gnat of
human rights for women and gay folks while swallowing the camel
of clerical sexual molestation of children?
Reading the
transcript, you can't help but wonder whether Nienstedt has
been keeping track of the stories that put him in front of Jeff
Anderson. During a lengthy exchange about Shelley--the priest
whose computer contained "borderline illegal"
images--Nienstedt is fuzzy on basic facts about the case, such
as which of his employees advised him to do what with those
photos. For several pages of testimony, he claims that the
archdiocese turned over the files to the police in
2004--that's why, he says, he didn't immediately have
the material sent to the cops when Haselberger discovered them
in 2012. "It was taken as a fact," Nienstedt
testified, "that that had already been turned over to the
police and the police had made a decision on it." But in
fact they had not. Nienstedt later corrected his mistaken, but
curiously detailed account. He got confused, he explained,
because the archdiocese had hired a retired law-enforcement
officer to review the images.
And when
Anderson questioned Nienstedt about Wehmeyer, again the
archbishop seemed oddly uninformed about the case. He repeatedly
claims that Haselberger warned him that Wehmeyer shouldn't
be promoted to pastor because he's "same-sex
attracted," that he had propositioned two young men at a
bookstore. What about Haselberger's concern about the
cleric's diagnosis of sexual addiction? Anderson asked.
"I don't recall that." And: "I don't
remember that at all." Which is odd, because Nienstedt said
that he read the report from the treatment facility Wehmeyer was
sent to after his misconduct came to light. Nienstedt also
can't recall that Wehmeyer was trying to pick up teenagers
at a gas station. (There's more to say about the Wehmeyer
case--especially the question of when the archdiocese learned of
the first allegation and how long it took to report it to
police. To be continued.)
This is leadership?!
3. Patricia
Miller on the perplexing statements the leader of the U.S.
Catholic bishops, Cardinal Timothy Dolan, made on television
last weekend, in which he claimed that if women want birth
control, no problem! All they have to do, by Lord, is walk into
any 7-11 in the land and buy all the slut pills they need:*
As usual, the Catholic bishops are tying to undercut support for
the continuum of women’s health care needs by treating
contraception, and the women who use it, with contempt. Happy
Easter Cardinal Dolan.
This counterfactual silliness — contraceptives on sale
beside the candy bars (not!) at 7-11 — is leadership?!
4. Thom
Curnutte and Peter
Montgomery (the excerpt below is from Montgomery) on the
Easter message of the Catholic bishop of Jimja diocese in
Uganda, Charles Martin Wamika, to his flock:
Charles Martin Wamika, Catholic bishop of Uganda’s Jimja
Diocese, reportedly used
his Easter message to praise those who have worked to free the
land of gays and to encourage parents of gay children to
turn them over to authorities. According to a post from human
rights activist Melanie Nathan, a young Ugandan reported,
"He said throughout human history the catholic church has
fought evil and blood has been shed, he called on all the
Christians to do whatever they can in their own means to clean
this city."
This is an Easter message? Calling on the faithful to
support purges that target minority groups who should be swept
from the land?
This is leadership? These men are what the Catholic
church calls pastoral leaders at this point in history, due to
the decisive leadership offered to the church by the man who led
it throughout the end of the 20th century and into the next
century, the man to be canonized tomorrow? The way in
which these bishops and archbishops and cardinals exercise
leadership is directly rooted in the ecclesiastical
vision and style of the pope to be canonized tomorrow.
If any of this is pastoral leadership or even plain
institutional leadership pure and simple, I'll, well, I
don't know what I'll do. I certainly won't be
celebrating tomorrow. That I do know for sure. What I suppose
I'll be doing instead is wondering where the capacity to
feel shame has gotten away to in one Catholic leader after
another these days, and in far too many complacent Catholic lay
folks, who permit ourselves to be "led" in such a
shoddy way by pastors who are anything but leaders and who are
the very antithesis of good shepherds of their flocks.
*Note that the phrase "slut pills" is me being
facetious, and certainly not something Cardinal Dolan said.
Please see my clarifying note about this to Heimerm in the
comments thread below.
|