| 
						 | 
								Catholic
										Church 'Systematically' Protected Abusive Priests, U.n. Says
							 
							
								By Tom Kington  Los Angeles Times  February 5,
								2014 
								  http://www.latimes.com/world/worldnow/la-fg-wn-un-catholic-church-abusive-priests-20140205,0,3036334.story#axzz2sRgc1QnB 
								  [with video] 
								  ROME -- The Roman Catholic Church has “systematically”
								protected predator priests, allowing “tens of thousands” of
								children to be abused, a United Nations
								committee said Wednesday in a scathing report that cast the
								first shadow over Pope Francis’
								honeymoon period as pontiff. 
								  The panel called on the Vatican to remove all suspects
								from their posts immediately and to open up its confidential
								archives in order “to hold abusers accountable.” 
								  “The committee is gravely concerned that the Holy See
								has not acknowledged the extent of the crimes committed, has not
								taken the necessary measures to address cases of child sexual
									abuse and to protect children, and has adopted policies and
								practices which have led to the continuation of the abuse by and
								the impunity of the perpetrators,” the report said. 
								  DOCUMENT:
										UN rights committee report on Vatican's policies toward
										sex abuse  
								  The Vatican, which signed the U.N. Convention on the
								Rights of the Child in 1990, has “consistently placed the
								preservation of the reputation of the Church and the protection
								of the perpetrators above children’s best interests,” said the
								report, accusing the Vatican of transferring abusive priests to
								new parishes where many have continued to abuse children, and of
								“humiliating” the families of victims into silence. 
								  In a sharply worded response, the Holy See’s
								ambassador to the U.N. in Geneva, Archbishop Silvano Tomasi,
								attacked the report, calling it “surprising” and full of
								“incorrect” statements, and alleging that the U.N. had ignored
								steps taken by the Vatican in recent years to root out abuse. 
								  In an interview with Vatican Radio, Tomasi also
								suggested that nongovernmental organizations that oppose the
								Vatican’s positions on homosexuality and gay marriage had
								influenced the U.N. report, giving it an “ideological” slant. 
								  Addressing the U.N. committee last month, Tomasi said
								the Vatican had no responsibility for abusers because "priests
								are citizens of their own states, and they fall under the
								jurisdiction of their own country." 
								  But the report disagreed, telling the Vatican that
								because priests are “bound by obedience to the pope” in canon
								law, the Vatican is accountable for their conduct. 
								  The report, released by the United Nations Committee
								on the Rights of the Child in Geneva, strongly urged the Vatican
								to oblige its priests and bishops to take all reports about
								abuse to the police and end what it termed a “code of silence”
								under which whistle-blowers were “ostracized, demoted and
								fired.” 
								  As a first step, the report urged the Vatican to
								appoint representatives of victims groups to the commission
								created by Francis in December to investigate abuse, and asked
								the Vatican to report back on progress made by 2017. 
								  Although the committee’s recommendations are
								nonbinding, they are a challenge to the pope, whose popularity
								has soared since he was elected in March, in part with the
								assumption that he would reform the Vatican. 
								  “Pope Francis has already missed opportunities to
								assert his authority to reverse the Church’s damaging policies
								over clerical abuse and unless he responds positively and
								quickly to the demands of the committee, he risks history
								judging his whole papacy a failure,” said Keith Porteous Wood,
								the executive director of Britain's National Secular Society,
								which gave evidence to the committee. 
							 
							
							
							
							
							
							
								 
								 
								 
							  |