|  | 
								Choosing
										Comfort over Truth: What It Means to Defend Woody Allen
							 
								By Jessica ValentiThe Nation
 February 4, 2014
 
 http://www.thenation.com/blog/178203/choosing-comfort-over-truth-what-it-means-defend-woody-allen
 
 
 
								
									|  |  
									| Director and actor Woody
										Allen poses as he arrives for the French premiere of Blue
										Jasmine in Paris, Tuesday, August 27, 2013. (AP
										Photo/Christophe Ena) 
 |  I’ve never watched a Woody Allen movie. My parents
							refused to rent them after he began a “relationship” with Soon-Yi
							Previn and their explanation stuck with me through adulthood. I
							was around 13 years old at the time, and always looking to pick a
							fight—I asked why it mattered since Previn wasn’t his “real”
							daughter. My parents sat me down and talked about the
							responsibility adults have to children, and certain boundaries
							that parents and parental figures must respect.
 
 As I grew older—as I had teachers come on to me as a
							teen, as I experienced the way grown men get away with
							sexualizing girls—I understood the significance of what my
							parents told me. Today, as an adult, I know that when we make
							excuses for particular, powerful men who hurt women, we make the
							world more comfortable for all abusers. And that this cultural
							cognitive dissonance around sexual assault and abuse is building
							a safety net for perpetrators that we should all be ashamed of.
 
 We know one in five girl children are sexually
							assaulted. Yet when victims speak out, we ask them why they
							waited so long to talk. We question why don’t they remember the
							details better. We suspect that they misunderstood what happened.
 
 We know that abusers are manipulative, often
							charismatic, and that they hide their crimes well. We know that
							they target women and children who society will be less likely to
							believe—low-income women, children of color, the disabled, women
							who can be discredited as “crazy.” Yet when the caretakers of
							children who have been abused come forward, we call them “vengeful,” as Allen’s lawyer called Mia
							Farrow. We accuse them of trying to “alienate” their children from the abusing
							parent. Or, as one of Allen’s friends did in a shameful article
							for The Daily Beast—we simply insinuate that the protective
							parent is just a slut, so how can you believe
							anything she says anyway?
 
 
								
 
 
 |