| The Problem Is the People, Not the Process
By Rod Dreher
American Conservative
October 14, 2013
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/the-problem-is-the-people-not-the-process/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-problem-is-the-people-not-the-process
A Catholic reader sent me this tremendous post from Commonweal’s Grant Gallicho, taking stock of the sex abuse/child porn mess in the Archdiocese of St. Paul-Minneapolis, which was broken by the reporting of Minnesota Public Radio (MPR). If you haven’t been following the story, Gallicho’s post will bring you up to speed. Gallicho talks in detail about how the previous Archbishop, Harry Flynn, covered up the discovery of a priest’s porn that might involve minors even though he was at the time the US Conference of Catholic Bishops’ point man for fixing the abuse scandal. His successor, Abp Nienstedt, was scarcely better. Now Nienstedt has appointed a priest to come up with an “independent lay task force” to investigate what happened and how it could be avoided in the future.
What butt-covering nonsense. Do they really need another panel to find out what the problem is? It’s not the process; it’s the people who run the diocese (and not just the bureaucrats). Gallicho says it well:
[P]erhaps it would be a good idea to stop pretending that these failures had anything to do with policy, and admit that they were entirely the fault of a culture that prized self-protection and secrecy above disclosure and, yes, justice. Is it appalling when an archbishop acknowledges to ecclesiastical authorities that one of his priests is in possession of “borderline illegal” images of children but can’t work up the will to share this information with the civil authorities? Yes. Just as it’s troubling that a bishop who had long won the praise of inaugural members of the USCCB National Review Board apparently promoted a priest who had no business anywhere near children, and then seemingly failed to report a priest who may have downloaded child porn–just two years after he voted to approve the very rules the bishops adopted to address the scandal. But should you be surprised that bishops who fail so miserably have underlings who have trouble reading the reddest of flags?
Of course, it’s not only clerics who help sustain this culture of denial. The maintenance man for the Wehmeyer’s parish told the police that for two years he noticed the same boys going to and from the priest’s camper. “We told [the parish’s business administrator], and she should have done something about it.” Why didn’t he?
That’s right. Passing the buck to avoid having to take responsibility. That man is guilty too. More:
No amount of “safe environment” training can fix this problem. It doesn’t matter how independent a diocesan review board is on paper. Or how many laypeople have been tasked to overhaul a diocese’s abuse policies. Or how sincerely a bishop promises to make room for a review board to do its work. We have seen it time and again. In Philadelphia, where the review board was seeing only the cases the archbishop decided to show them. In Kansas City-St. Joseph, where the review board wasn’t informed of the child pornography on one of their priest’s computers. In Newark, where a priest who admitted to groping a boy sexually was given a hospital assignment and a card proving his good standing. If a bishop decides to keep allegations to himself, he can. If he wants to sabotage strong sexual-abuse policies, he’s free to do so. The only reason you’re reading about any of this is because Jennifer Haselberger went public.
And the only person who can act decisively to change this culture of denial lives in Rome. Do you think he’s listening to MPR?
What he means is that the problem is with the bishops themselves. Until and unless the Pope starts holding bishops accountable, nothing will change. Commonweal, of course, is left of center, and there will be some conservative Catholics who won’t want to listen to them for that reason. That would be a shame, because Gallicho here points to the collapse of moral credibility that bishops like Nienstedt have brought on themselves:
Nienstedt’s service as archbishop of St. Paul and Minneapolis has been distinguished by an energetic, and expensive, campaign against gay marriage. He recently told a crowd of “influential,” wealthy Catholics that sodomy and pornography were the work of Satan–that they threatened the stability of our civilization. No one could accuse him of failing to take those issues seriously. Except, perhaps, those who take stock of his failures to act in these two cases.
Fight gay marriage for all you’re worth, but turn a blind eye to a gay priest searching out pictures of naked boys, and a gay priest being caught multiple times seeking sex with men? And the archbishop actually thinks people are supposed to take his anti-gay marriage, anti-porn activism seriously? He won’t even police his own priests.
UPDATE: Reader “Becky” posts in the comments section:
There is something strange and perverse that seems to lead people to conceal such things. I don’t understand it, but (as Penn State shows), it’s not unique to Catholics or even hierarchical cultures.
I have a toddler who is my mom’s only grandchild. She claims to be, and acts as if she is, completely besotted with him.
I have two deadbeat adult male cousins who live with one of my aunts in the same town as my mom and other family, which is about three hours away from me. Every week, the entire family in that town gets together for dinner after church.
My mother has been begging me to visit her for the past few months. A visit would always include the post-church family dinner.
To make a very long story short, I recently learned that my deadbeat cousins had been busted for possessing lots and lots of child pornography. At the moment, they are free and awaiting charges — there is a huge backlog in analyzing computer data where they live. But they had been at it for several years and had huge numbers of illicit files. I don’t know any details of the type of pornography except that it involves children. As a mom, I am beyond sickened. I never, ever want to see these cousins again, and I hope they get long sentences.
My mother has known since July. For months, she has begged me to visit knowing that my son would be around these monsters if I were to do so. And she had no intention of telling me about their “hobby.” One of my other cousins did visit with his young daughter after my mother knew … and she didn’t tell him.
It is unlikely that my son would have been unsupervised around the evil cousins, which is my mother’s excuse for not informing me. She thought it would be just fine and dandy for my child to hang out with known pedophiles as long as they didn’t have any obvious opportunities to brutalize him. As if I would knowingly allow my child to interact with people who choose to derive sexual pleasure from such horrible things.
My mother is a protestant fundamentalist and (retired) teacher. She should know better on so many levels. But when I finally did find out and confronted her, the next thing she did was call the family member who told me to chew him out for spilling the beans.
She claims to now realize she was gravely in error and to be sorry. I am trying to forgive her, although obviously I can’t ever really trust her again. I feel like there must be some near-universal impulse to lie and protect sexual predators instead of protecting the innocent. I wish I understood why.
I think it has more to do with people being willing to tell themselves and others any lies they have to for the sake of avoiding facing things they’d rather not face. When it comes to serious sexual transgression — and child sexual abuse (actual or taking pleasure in watching it in porn) is about the worst sexual transgression we can imagine — to acknowledge that it happened is to recognize that nothing can ever be the same again. If Uncle Joe molested children, or Father Bob watches child porn in the rectory, then the system (the family system, the religious system) fails. That’s the fear, anyway. So people deny that it’s really happening, and demand that everybody else accept the Big Lie to keep things from falling apart. What happens is that the thing that might have saved the system — facing the problem openly and honestly, and dealing with it — seems to happen so rarely.
|