BishopAccountability.org
	2 New Startling Revelations in Priest Porn Case, SNAP Responds SNAP August 18, 2011 http://www.snapnetwork.org/snap_statements/2011_statements/081911_2_new_startling_revelations_in_priest_porn_case_snap_responds.htm Statement by Mike Hunter of Kansas City, Kansas City Leader of SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (913 634 6490, mhunter535@gmail.com) The latest filing by federal prosecutors in the Fr. Shawn Ratigan case contain two new disturbing revelations. They make Bishop Finn's earlier claims even less likely to be true and even more difficult to believe. First, even after repeated warnings from multiple sources about Fr. Ratigan’s sexually inappropriate actions around kids (an alleged 2006 warning, a compelling 2010 letter from a school principal, Ratigan’s 2010 suicide note, and hundreds of creepy photos of kids on Ratigan’s computer), Catholic officials let Ratigan keep using a computer at his latest assignment in Independence and even let him buy a new one just weeks before his arrest. Second, the new filing says that Ratigan’s church supervisors asked him “about a ‘close-up vaginal’ photograph found on his computer.” Finn claims he wasn't sure if this is child porn. Does anyone really believe this? Citizens and Catholics should ask Finn about these new disclosures and insist that he address them directly and clearly, not through his public relations professionals. Finn should specifically and clearly explain perhaps the single most troubling choice he made. According to federal prosecutors, church officials "described” one photo to one police officer. But church officials GAVE numerous photos to church defense lawyers. If Finn had any doubt whatsoever about the possible sexual nature or content of the priest’s photos, why would he give all of them to his defense lawyer but only talk about one of them with the police? We aren’t legal experts, but we also wonder if, as an officer of the court,” Finn’s lawyer had an obligation to go to police. Every few days, new and ever-more damaging information surfaces about how Finn and his top aides deceived the public and parishioners about child sex crimes and kept evidence from the police. Each disclosure seems to be worse than the last. Each bit of news makes it obvious that what happened here wasn’t a series of unfortunate mistakes, but rather a series of deliberate choices – choices to protect adults’ reputations and jobs instead of kids’ innocence and safety. Finally, regarding possible sentences for Fr. Ratigan. let's not put the cart before the horse. Our first concern is making sure each kid he hurt gets identified and helped. Our second concern is making sure each victim, witness and whistleblower calls police so Ratigan - and those who hid his crimes - can be effectively prosecuted and kept away from children. It's not helpful to even begin thinking about possible sentences when most of his victims have yet to be helped. Kids need and deserve adults to take action, not become complacent. (SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, is the world’s oldest and largest support group for clergy abuse victims. We’ve been around for 23 years and have more than 10,000 members. Despite the word “priest” in our title, we have members who were molested by religious figures of all denominations, including nuns, rabbis, bishops, and Protestant ministers. Our website is SNAPnetwork.org) Contact - David Clohessy (314-566-9790 cell, SNAPclohessy@aol.com), Barbara Blaine (312-399-4747, SNAPblaine@gmail.com),Peter Isely (414-429-7259, peterisely@yahoo.com),Barbara Dorris (314-862-7688 home, 314-503-0003 cell, SNAPdorris@gmail.com). http://www.kansascity.com/2011/08/18/3085410/federal-prosecutors-want-life.html Federal prosecutors want life sentence for priest in child pornography case By MARK MORRIS-The Kansas City Star A Catholic priest accused of producing child pornography should receive life in prison if convicted, federal prosecutors declared Thursday. Prosecutors disclosed their sentencing goals in a motion asking that the Rev. Shawn Ratigan remain in jail pending trial. They filed the paperwork just minutes before Ratigan’s first federal court appearance on 13 counts of production, attempted production and possession of child pornography. John P. O’Connor, Ratigan’s lawyer, entered not guilty pleas to all the federal charges on his client’s behalf. The priest, dressed in black jail scrubs and still sporting a bushy, full beard, did not speak during his brief appearance. Because Ratigan has not been able to make bond on three Clay County counts of possessing child pornography, U.S. Magistrate Judge Sarah W. Hays said she would defer ruling on the federal detention motion unless it became necessary. The court filings also disclosed new information about how leaders of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph responded when they learned that troubling photographs had been discovered on Ratigan’s computer. The priest had given that computer to a technician for repair in December. Ratigan allegedly lied to his supervisors when they asked if he had taken the pictures, court records said. In addition to various “upskirt” and “crotch” photographs, the supervisors asked Ratigan about a “close-up vaginal” photograph found on his computer, court records said. Other court records have described that picture as a girl lying down with her panties pulled aside. Church officials have not described their initial discussions with Ratigan about the photographs, but have suggested that they weren’t certain that the pictures constituted child pornography. In a statement on May 20, just after Ratigan was arrested on the state charges, Bishop Robert Finn said that he had learned in December about “images of an unclothed child who was not identifiable because her face was not visible.” The diocese soon described the images to a Kansas City police officer and showed them to a lawyer, Finn said. Both said the images were troubling, but were not child porn because they did not show “sexual conduct or contact,” according to Finn. Federal prosecutors later concluded that the image that Ratigan denied taking was pornographic and charged him. Rebecca Summers, a spokeswoman for the diocese, noted that the prosecutors’ description of Ratigan’s questioning was not specific as to when it occurred and which of his supervisors were involved. For those reasons, Summers said, she was not comfortable commenting on the episode. “The diocese was not present for these proceedings,” Summers said. Immediately after church officials seized Ratigan’s computer, the priest attempted suicide, received psychiatric care and was assigned to live in an Independence mission house. Prosecutors disclosed Thursday that in addition to accessing Facebook from a computer in a common area of the house, Ratigan also purchased a computer, which he used in his apartment for about 10 days before his arrest. Images of a 12-year-old girl found on that computer, taken on Easter Sunday, April 24, formed the basis of a charge against Ratigan of attempted production of child pornography. Anticipating Ratigan’s transfer from state to federal custody, O’Connor asked that the priest be incarcerated at a jail for pre-trial detainees in Leavenworth. He also asked that Ratigan be watched closely. “I believe he would be in danger if placed with other inmates,” O’Connor said. “He also could be a danger to himself. I’m concerned for his safety.” O’Connor also said that Ratigan was on suicide watch for the first three weeks he was in custody at the Clay County Jail. To reach Mark Morris, call 816-234-4310 or send email to mmorris@kcstar.com. Posted on Thu, Aug. 18, 2011 11:15 PM
Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution.