BishopAccountability.org
	Psychiatrists Question Philadelphia Investigation, Defend Priests Catholic Culture April 12, 2011 http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=9963 Richard Fitzgibbons (a psychiatric counselor and consultant to the Vatican's Congregation for the Clergy) and his partner Peter Kleponis raise a series of serious questions about the recent grand-jury report on priestly abuse in Philadelphia, and the archdiocesan response. * Why were 21 priests suspended in the wake of the report, when the archdiocese had already investigated them and found the evidence of wrongdoing unpersuasive? * Why were investigations not conducted in confidence, but the priests were exposed to public contempt--so that their reputations can never be fully repaired, even if a 2nd investigation finds them innocent? * Why is a "repressed memory" accepted as credible evidence of abuse? * Why did the archdiocese make no attempt to distinguish between priests who molested young people and those guilty of "boundary violations," which may be inappropriate behavior but is not abusive or criminal? * Why do is there so little attention paid to the likelihood of false accusations?
Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution.