BishopAccountability.org | ||||
Vatican Opposed Mandatory Reporting of Abuse By Ed Brayton Dispatches from the Culture Wars January 20, 2011 http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2011/01/vatican_opposed_mandatory_repo.php?utm_source=sbhomepage&utm_medium=link&utm_content=channellink
The New York Times publishes the text of a letter from the Vatican to their leadership in Ireland, who had passed a policy of mandatory reporting of sexual abuse by priests to the police. Unsurprisingly, the Vatican didn't like that policy. By 1996, an advisory committee of Irish bishops had drawn up a new policy that included "mandatory reporting" of suspected abusers to civil authorities. The letter, signed by Archbishop Luciano Storero, then the Vatican's apostolic nuncio -- or chief representative -- in Ireland, told the Irish bishops that the Vatican had reservations about mandatory reporting for both "moral and canonical" reasons. Archbishop Storero died in 2000. This is yet another smoking gun showing that the Vatican long opposed mandatory reporting of sexual abuse by priests. We know that the current pope wrote a letter in 2001 telling bishops that they were to keep all such complaints within the church hierarchy only and not report them to the police. And we know that in the specific case of a priest in California, the current pope wrote a letter opposing the defrocking of a priest even after he was convicted of lewd conduct with a minor and even after his local diocese had concluded that he must be removed from the church. I've said it before, I'll say it again: The Catholic Church should be held to exactly the same standards that any teacher, police officer or doctor is held to. They are legally required to report cases of abuse to the police. And if priests and bishops fail to do so, they should be jailed as accessories after the fact. |
||||
Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution. | ||||