BishopAccountability.org
	Attack on the Archbishop Obscures Horror of Abuse Catholic Herald April 15, 2010 http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/features/opinion/o0000364.shtml The extent of the abuse of children by Catholic priests and religious would never have been revealed without the media. One newspaper in particular exposed decades of paedophile crimes hushed up by American Church leaders: the Boston Globe, whose book-length investigation into abuse, lies and bribery led to the resignation of Cardinal Bernard Law of Boston. The Globe articles were devastating because they were so carefully researched. Unfortunately, other newspapers - eager to gain similar plaudits for revealing clerical conspiracies - do not appear to have taken such care. In America, the New York Times and the Associated Press have tried to implicate Pope Benedict XVI in the cover-up of crimes during his period as prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. They have failed to do so, but their apparently slapdash research has helped fuel an atmosphere of anti-Catholic hysteria focused on the one person - the former Cardinal Ratzinger - who did more than any other to reform the Vatican's utterly inadequate procedures for dealing with abuse cases. We believe this amounts to journalistic irresponsibility and, sadly, this has not been confined to the United States. In Britain, one newspaper has consistently published biased reports under inflammatory headlines: the Times. Until this week, Pope Benedict was the chief victim of what appeared to many Catholic readers to be a campaign not against paedophile priests but against the Church, backed by gruesomely insulting cartoons. On Saturday, however, these same tactics were applied to Archbishop Vincent Nichols of Westminster. A headline appeared in the Times implying that, while he was Archbishop of Birmingham, he helped cover up a sex scandal in a Benedictine monastery in Ealing, west London. The Archbishop did no such thing and, as we report today, he is consulting his lawyers about this slur. Catholics are becoming more and more angered by the seemingly lazy reporting and cheap innuendos that the Times has been directing at the Church for well over a year, obscuring rather than illuminating the horror of abuse by priests; for, if the blameless Archbishop Nichols is attacked in this way, who will believe the paper if it identifies a truly guilty prelate? The newspaper's bias bodes ill for the Pope's visit - and, indeed, is causing alarm in British as well as Vatican diplomatic circles. It is also self-destructive. This year, much of the online content of the Times will disappear behind a paywall. Has it not occurred to Rupert Murdoch that Britain's Catholics, who are as revolted by abuse as everyone else, cannot in good conscience pay money to read news stories, columns and headlines that blacken the names of innocent men?
Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution.