BishopAccountability.org | ||
Catholic Fury over the Times's Coverage of Pope Benedict XVI By Damian Thompson Telegraph March 13, 2010 http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100029771/catholic-fury-over-the-timess-coverage-of-pope-benedict-xvi/ UNITED KINGDOM -- There is international outrage in Catholic circles over a headline in The Times this morning that many people regard as utterly misleading and part of the newspaper's reliably biased coverage (reinforced by vicious cartoons) of anything to do with Pope Benedict XVI. The headline, over a story by Richard Owen, reads: "Pope knew priest was paedophile but allowed him to continue with ministry." A universally admired Catholic journalist contacted me this morning and accused The Times of (and I am toning this down for legal reasons) an extremely serious error of judgment. Another respected commentator, the American journalist Phil Lawler, takes the headline to pieces on CatholicCulture.org. This is what he has to say: Count on the London Times to offer the most sensational coverage of a news story involving the Catholic Church. The headline on today's report by Richard Owen screams: And now let us turn to the commentary by Ruth Gledhill, under another nasty headline: "Scandal still not enough to threaten the Pope". (The Times will just have try harder, eh?) It begins: The case of a sex abuser being given accommodation in Munich with the approval of its then archbishop, now the Pope, is reminiscent of the scandal that engulfed Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor soon after his appointment to Westminster. No, it is NOT reminiscent of that scandal, Ruth. The Pope did not put a paedophile back into circulation; in contrast, the Cardinal showed very bad judgment in the case of Michael Hill and was lucky to hang on to his position. But, by writing such bollocks, you make it reminiscent. And then there is this gem: The Pope is pretty unassailable. He is not elected… Ruth, it long ago became clear to me that you do not know nearly enough about the Catholic Church to comment on it authoritatively. But surely even you have heard of something called a conclave. |
||
Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution. | ||