BishopAccountability.org
	Ryan Report Conclusions on Daingean Reformatory Offaly Express May 27, 2009 http://www.offalyexpress.ie/15744/Ryan-Report-conclusions-on-Daingean.5307381.jp • Daingean was not a suitable location or building for a reformatory. The refusal by management to accept any responsibility for even day-to-day maintenance led to its complete disintegration over the years. • Daingean did not provide a safe environment. Management failed in its duty to ensure that all boys were protected. They lived in a climate of fear in which they were isolated, frightened and bullied by both staff and inmates. • Gangs of boys op erated as a form of alternative government, victimising those who did not obey them, while the Brothers did nothing to break the system but acquiesced in it. • Flogging was an inhumane and cruel form of punishment. A senior management respondent described it as 'a most revolting thing' and 'a kind of a horror', and another respondent said that he was 'horrified' when he witnessed it, but the management did nothing to stop it and discussed the practice freely with the Department of Education and the Kennedy Committee. • Corporal punishment was a means of maintaining control and discipline, and it was the first response by many of the staff in Daingean for even minor transgressions. Black eyes, split lips, and bruising were reported by complainants. There was no control of staff in the infliction of punishment. • A punishment book was part of a proper regime, as well as being required by law. • The Department of Education knew that its rules were being breached in a fundamental way and management in Daingean operated the system of punishment in the knowledge that the Department would not interfere. • Sexual abuse of boys by staff took place in Daingean, as complainant witnesses testified. • The full extent of this abuse is impossible to quantify because of the absence of a proper system of receiving, handling and recording complaints and investigations. • The system that was put in place tended to suppress complaints rather than to reveal abuse or even to bring about investigations. • The Congregation in their Submission and Statements have not admitted that sexual abuse took place or even considered the possibility, but instead have directed their efforts to contending that it is impossible to find that such abuse actually occurred. • Having regard to the extent of the abuse of which Br Ramon was found guilty in Wales, the reservations expressed about his time in London, the known recidivist nature of sexual abuse and the complainant evidence received by the Investigation Committee, there must be serious misgivings about this Brother's behaviour in Daingean during his long service there. • The Oblates acknowledged that they were aware of peer abuse and accepted that such incidents did take place. • Sexual behaviour between boys, which was often abusive, was a major issue that developed to such a degree because of the lack of effective supervision throughout the Institution and particularly during recreation. • The unsafe environment caused some boys to seek protection through sexual relationships with other boys in order to survive.
Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution.