BishopAccountability.org
	Church-abuse Plaintiff: It Was Never about the Money By Janet I. Tu Seattle Times May 21, 2009 http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2009242616_webchurchtrial20m.html The only remaining plaintiff in a trial against the Seattle Archdiocese settled his case Tuesday evening for $700,000, feeling "really good that he got to tell his story," his attorney said. "That was the most important thing." Brian Adam, the 44-year-old Auburn man whose $700,000 settlement with the Seattle Archdiocese Tuesday evening ended a two-week-long trial over sexual abuse Adams suffered as a boy, said today that "it's never been about the money." He acknowledged that the archdiocese had offered him the same amount of money several months ago and that the offer stood even as the trial began. "If it was about the money, I would've settled three months ago and just saved putting myself through the whole pain and agony of what I went through," Adam said. The Seattle Times is naming Adam with his permission. There were three things Adam wanted when he filed his lawsuit in 2005, he said. One of those he knew he wouldn't get: the jailing of his abuser, Patrick O'Donnell, a former Spokane priest who served in Seattle in the late 1970s. The criminal statute of limitations to prosecute O'Donnell has long expired. The other two things he wanted were to tell his story, and to make church officials get on the stand and "tell everybody that mistakes were made, there were child abusers, it was kept quiet, and (the abusers) were moved around," he said. Out of the hundreds of priest-abuse cases filed against the Seattle Archdiocese, this was the first to go to trial. "Somebody had to be the advocate for people who went through what they went through" and hold the church accountable through a trial, Adam said. The archdiocese's lawyers had set a 9 a.m. Wednesday deadline for Adam to accept the settlement offer. The deadline made him assess how the case was going, and made him realize he had reached his objectives, he said. "When I walked off that stand" after an emotional testimony Tuesday morning in which he described his abuse at age 13 by O'Donnell, "the weight that was released for me was unbelievable," he said. The trial stemmed from a lawsuit filed in 2005 by the plaintiff and three other men, who said the archdiocese didn't do enough to protect them from O'Donnell. O'Donnell had been sent by then-Spokane Bishop Bernard Topel to Seattle for sexual-deviancy treatment in 1976, after abuse allegations against him surfaced in Spokane. The case was not about O'Donnell's guilt — he's admitted to molesting at least 30 boys, including the plaintiff. Rather, the case hinged on whether Hunthausen and others in the archdiocese knew of O'Donnell's abusive history when they allowed him to serve at St. Paul Church in Rainier Beach from 1976 to 1978. The plaintiff's attorneys contended that Hunthausen must have been told by his good friend Topel about O'Donnell's past. And, at the least, they said, the archdiocese hadn't followed its own vetting procedures when it let O'Donnell serve at St. Paul without even a recommendation letter. In his testimony, Hunthausen had said he was never warned that O'Donnell had abused children, though the archbishop acknowledged that he did not follow the normal process at the time for allowing the priest to serve here. "It was a breach on my part," he said, adding that he had simply trusted Topel. "I know I shouldn't have done that." Kosnoff said his client settled, in part, because of questions some jurors asked after he testified that after O'Donnell abused him in Seattle, he went to visit the priest in Spokane, where he was abused again. "In honesty, we were influenced by those four jurors who asked these questions about why he went back," Kosnoff said. "I don't want to call it blaming the victim, but it definitely signaled to us that jurors had questions about that and we had to take that into account." Before the Seattle trial, Adam had settled his claims regarding the same abuse with the Spokane Diocese and the Sulpician Roman Catholic order that ran the seminary O'Donnell attended. Altogether, the settlements total about $1.2 million or $1.3 million — to be reduced by attorneys fees. Two of the four original plaintiffs settled before trial; the third settled Monday. The plaintiff who settled Monday for $550,000 had also settled earlier with the other parties. Seattle Archdiocese attorney Patterson said, "I'm glad we were able to resolve this." But, he said, "these two men had separate cases against Spokane and against the Sulpicians, for which they received substantial amounts of money. ... You heard of double-dipping. This was triple-dipping." In a statement, Seattle Archbishop Alex Brunett said: "It is my hope that the settlements to all four victims will help them in their journey of healing. "It is always our practice to offer fair and just settlements as well as counseling and pastoral care to victims in the hope that they will receive all the assistance they need from the church to rebuild their lives," Brunett said. On the stand Tuesday, Adam spoke quietly and with long pauses as he struggled to keep his composure. He had met O'Donnell when he was a student at St. Paul school and attended the parish church. Adam said O'Donnell started a teen club at the church. Through the club, boys played basketball with the priest and went on boating trips with him. O'Donnell abused him on two such outings, he said. The first encounter was his first sexual experience. Adam said that after O'Donnell returned to Spokane, he and a friend went to visit him. The priest took them to stay at a friend's house. During that trip, the plaintiff said, O'Donnell got into bed with him and abused him even more seriously. When he began crying, the priest stopped, and the boy went to the bathroom. The priest came in, telling him — as he usually did after these incidents — that everything was going to be OK, and it was just between the two of them, the plaintiff said. After O'Donnell went to bed, the plaintiff said, he sat at a table in the room and sobbed. For a long time he didn't tell anyone about the abuses. "Maybe because he was a priest and I was always taught not to question their authority," he said. His testimony was followed by testimony from his therapist, Annette Fehrenbach, a Seattle psychologist. She told jurors it's not uncommon for a child to be abused several times by the same person without telling anyone about it. "A child's brain works differently" than an adult's, Fehrenbach said. Children engage in "magical thinking," she said, believing the abuse won't happen again. They also take their cues from those around them, so if people are saying that a certain priest is a great guy, it's hard for a child to contradict that. Children may also simply be fearful of accusing an adult of doing a bad thing, she said, and children who've endured such abuse also often feel shame and blame themselves for it. Janet I. Tu: 206-464-2272 or jtu@seattletimes.com
Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution.