BishopAccountability.org | ||
Appeal against Conviction for False Accusation Fails One in Four February 22, 2008 http://www.oneinfour.org/news/news2008/accusation/ The Court of Criminal Appeal has dismissed an appeal by a man against his conviction for falsely accusing a priest of child sexual abuse. Paul Anderson (34), Crumlin Park, Crumlin, formerly of Fatima Mansions and Iveagh Trust Flats, New Bride Street, Dublin, was convicted last June after a 17-day trial of making the false claim. He was jailed for four years by Judge Patricia Ryan at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court. Anderson had denied making a false accusation to a detective garda at Kevin Street station on June 18th, 2003, that acts of indecent assault and buggery were committed on him by the priest between February and May 1981. The three-judge appeals court, with Mr Justice Joseph Finnegan presiding and sitting with Mr Justice Daniel Herbert and Mr Justice Paul Gilligan, yesterday dismissed Anderson's appeal against his conviction. His appeal against his four-year sentence was adjourned. Justin Dillon SC, for Anderson, had argued that the conviction should be set aside on grounds including that the trial judge had erred by including as evidence during the trial a statement by Anderson to the Garda in which he made certain admissions. The statement was made after his client had been in custody for more than five hours and should not have been admitted for a number of reasons, including the failure to video-record it, Mr Dillon said. He also claimed that gardaí had acted in an improper manner towards Anderson while he was in custody, that gardaí had threatened to jail his parents and had asked his sister to speak with him while he was detained. Dominic McGinn, for the DPP, argued there was no evidence to show that Judge Ryan had erred and said the conviction should remain undisturbed. The only evidence of any wrongdoing by gardaí before the court was from Anderson and his witnesses and the trial judge had found that evidence was not truthful, credible or consistent. The court dismissed all grounds of Anderson's appeal. Mr Justice Finnegan said the court was satisfied that there was evidence before the trial judge which justified her findings and that no error had occurred. |
||
Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution. | ||