BishopAccountability.org | ||||
Giuliani, Hannity and the Accused Molester Lone Star Times December 10, 2007 http://lonestartimes.com/2007/12/10/giuliani-hannity-and-the-accused-molester/ A funny thing happened on the way home Friday. I left early and tuned in to hear Sean Hannity interview Mike Huckabee. The interview dealt with Huckabee's role in the parole of Wayne Dumond, a convicted rapist. It seemed odd that Huckabee would attempt to defend his role on Hannity's show, given that Hannity is pushing Rudy Giuliani's candidacy very strongly. Sure enough, it was nothing more than a Hannity setup, a blatant attempt to stop Huckabee's momentum. Perhaps it works, perhaps it doesn't but that wasn't the real story. The real story, at least for me, came when a female caller came on the air. She proceeded to rip Huckabee, saying he never met a tax he didn't like, that he was "soft" on illegals and criminals and had no foreign policy experience, i.e., the usual distortions. Hannity was eating it up, telling her that he had serious questions in his mind about these issues in regards to Huckabee. So he was feeling pretty chipper. He then asked the caller which of the other candidates she was for. She proceeded to tell him anyone but Rudy. On no! Hannity went ballistic, carrying on about how he's the best on crime, talked about his handling of 9/11, etc. The caller interrupted him and told him that she could never vote for Giuliani because he has an alleged child molester on his staff. Again Hannity exploded, telling her that he knew the priest was innocent. This got my attention. Yes, he "knows" the priest is innocent because….the priest, Fr. Alan Placa, was once his teacher. So. Sean Hannity was a student under the priest and vouches for his veracity. Isn't that special? Let's revisit the grand jury testimony for a bit:
Ironically, Priest F would later become instrumental in the development of Diocesan policy in response to allegations of sexual abuse of children by priests. It is rarely discussed but not only is Hannity playing up Giuliani on his TV and radio shows, he also headlined a fundraiser for him.
In so doing, some believe that Hannity - while clearly a commentator paid to express his opinions - crossed the line from punditry into financial rainmaking for a presidential candidate whose bottom line is now better for it.
The question is, will Republicans begin to resist the political establishment's and main stream media's foisting of a candidate upon us that we don't want? Or should we consider Hannity as just another Oprah, campaigning for her man? |
||||
Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution. | ||||