BishopAccountability.org
	John Paul II DA Vinci Code Opus Dei By Paris Arrow John Paul II Millstone October 3, 2007 http://jp2m.blogspot.com/ October 6 marks the (speediest) canonization of Josemaria Escriba and the Da Vinci Code is again in the news as Opus Dei defend themselves from it. Here is a comment that attests The John Paul II Millstone point that Opus Dei controls the papacy and many secular countries because the Opus Dei's main goal is WORLD DOMINATION as seen in the map of their website. Most of all, this crime investigator attests our original point that Opus Dei was the foremost responsible group in the cover-up of priest-pedophilia, the worst crime in modern church history. Pay attention to the details he presents which we highlighted in bold ...... and he actually dare declares that "Opus Dei, apart from anything else, is war criminals!" Whoa! Whoa! Whoa! And here we are being warned that we are walking on Opus Dei-landmines because of our humble non-profit weblog exposing the Achilles Heel of John Paul II and our mission to America that John Paul II must not be declared a "saint" in American soil and by American lips. Victims - Attackers - Responsible Leaders Pearl Harbor - 3,000 victims - 170 planes - Admiral Yamamoto WTC & 9/11 attacks - 5,000 victims - 19 Muslims - Osama bin Laden USA Priest Pedophilia - 12,000 victims - 5,148 priests - John Paul II + Benedict XVI + Josemaria Escriba OD (the new Roman Catholic Trinity! Ripley's Believe it or Not!) Watch on Google link and the detailed role of Benedict XVI in the cover up of priest-pedophilia in http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/ Those millions of American dollar$$$ are better off if they were given to feed the poor in Africa rather than spent on useless John Paul II relics that are powerless and souvenirs that will only add to the wealth of Opus Dei. As this crime investigator in his Opus Dei article said: "A Papal dress or two would feed an African village for a week." A crime investigator's statements on Opus Dei Since I happen to know some people who are –and have been — in Opus Dei, maybe I can say something of how I understand they work. On behalf of the church, Opus Dei subverts all secular government, Bar and Bench, Civil Service, Police, Hospitals, and most importantly, schools. Anyone who has lived in a Catholic country, knows that there is no Separation of Powers possible where the Church are in the ascendant; no independent Bench or independent Bar is possible: nowhere in Catholic controlled countries is there any break in Catholic power at any level, political, administrative, or judicial. From the lowest school to the highest educational authority in the land, no matter what the constitution says, the fingerprints of the Opus are to be found everywhere one cares to look, including the ratlining of Nazis, the appointment of secret soldiers, the defamation of heretics or people who think differently than the prevailing Catholic milieu. Opus Dei, like their neurotic leader, is a menace. It imagines itself doing good by protecting paedophiles, crooks, gangsters, militant men and profoundly bovine women. They thread people to a web that is out of their ken, yet, like the Jesuits; they have no question to ask. They are the basest cogs in a materialistic machine that one could possibly find anywhere. They are afraid of discourse, because their true ends will be revealed: they are the brute engines of an utterly corrupt Papacy. And where the Roman Church cannot attain totalitarian status, it foments division and war. Even a small insignificant country like Ireland, which was beggared by the Church for over a thousand years, it controlled its executive towards its own terrible ends. In WW11 Ireland was ostensibly neutral, and yet it refused to help the poor Jews. What did the Church, including Opus Dei, get it to do? Ask De Valera, who under their instructions, ratlined Nazis, and even gave them prominent jobs, while poor dispossessed Jews were given the back of the Catholic Republic hand. Or ask the late Dermot Morgan (Father Ted) who, like James Joyce, became berufsverboten in his own country. Or, perhaps, the defenders of 'Octopus Dei' (as some wit called it) might like to talk about. AIB Bankers, paedophilic schools, Hospitals that rib out women's wombs rather than countenance the use of contraceptives, Bishops that count the consumption of Tampons. Perhaps they haven't heard that the Irish taxpayer is compelled to pay for the damage done by Pope's clerical paedophiles. Defamation.? I know what I would like to do with them. Those who hid the Nazis did so because they shared their values – and did so as early as the Spanish Civil War. Opus Dei, apart from anything else, is war criminals! In any event Opus Dei has no character – how could it be defamed? The problem with Tony Blair, if anyone cares to examine his precarious history as a British socialist, is that he was sucked into the Papal embrace, since when he was caste in league with Bush against Islam, just as the Spanish, the Irish and the Australians tested the Christian waters by their invasion of East Timor. The Christian colonies were turning tricks for the Pharaoh in Rome. Mr Blair has many problems on many fronts — problems like Adoption, Opus Dei in his government, tensions between his own citizens on a sectarian basis, a very accommodating influx of Catholic Poles, and an unjust and unfair war that properly goads him out of office. And though one might not have noticed it, there are stronger sounds recently that the sovereign should role back its ban on Catholics. In other words, we should come to suspect that the King of England might be a Catholic. Now, given the role of Opus Dei and the religious Orders with respect to rat lining the Nazis (for which in my humble opinion they should all be treated as war-criminals), can anyone imagine what it would be like with a Catholic King? It would be worse than Ireland, where Opus Dei run the runners of the government. The trouble with Protestants is that they are wet; they have forgotten the whats, the whys and the wherefores of a cruel and malignant mediaeval Papacy. Seamus Breathnach www.irishcriminology.com These were the preceeding paragraphs: In their attack on Dan Brown, Opus Dei says "Many people are intrigued by the claims about Christian history and theology presented in The Da Vinci Code. We would like to remind them that The Da Vinci Code is a work of fiction, and it is not a reliable source of information on these matters" In Dan Brown's defence – not that he needs one, especially from a secret society that has managed with the Franciscans – to ratline the worst monsters in recent history — that "Many people are intrigued by the claims about Christian history and theology presented in The Bible as well as the occasional Regensburg Lecture. I would like to remind them that The Bible (Part 2) is also a work of fiction, and it is not a reliable source of information on these matters" Indeed, it is because of the fictitious nature of the Bible that countries around the world have mistakenly taken the parable of the 'Loaves and Fishes' as an economic theory of production. But the propagators in Rome never quite believed this fiction when it came to feeding themselves. Indeed, a Papal dress or two would feed an African village for a week. So, fiction, if it is Dan Brown's weakness, is no great virtue of the Catholic Church or its Orders, militant or mendicant. When they're not persecuting and punishing someone, they are begging off them! Dan Brown works for his money and he has no reason to run around the world subverting governments, Civil Servants, Law Departments, Judges and other powerful people who serve the endless needs of the babyless church. None of Opus Dei's members were ever born in a stable, though many of them belong there! Source of article: http://www.speroforum.com/site/mbarticle.asp?id=3665 Books by Seamus Breathnach : http://www.irishcriminology.com/21.html — Towards a Criminology of Children in Ireland — The Criminological History Of Ireland — Emile Durkheim on Crime and Punishment, An Exegesis — Crime and Punishment in Twentieth Century Ireland. Volume 1: To Those Who Wait, 1900-1950 — Crime and Punishment in Twentieth Century Ireland: Volume 2: A Description of The Criminal Justice System, 1950-1980 — The Irish police: From earliest times to the present day — Irish American Cases Bravo Seamus! You nailed the lid on the OD ! Why don't you write a book called The Opus Dei Criminology? That will surely outdo the Da Vinci Code. Josemaria Escriba's neurotic obsession on his native name since he was born poor. He wanted to appear as if he belonged to Spanish nobility (like St. Ignatius Loyola was born into) so he used all his powers as a civil lawyer to add extra words and titles to his name. See http://jp2m.blogspot.com/2006/11/john-paul-ii-and-saint-josemaria.html
Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution.