BishopAccountability.org
|
||
What Did Jp2 Know? When Did He Know It? By Rod Dreher Beliefnet [Poland] January 10, 2007 http://www.beliefnet.com/blogs/crunchycon/2007/01/what-did-jp2-know-when-did-he-know-it.html The clerical crisis in Poland deepens. A Catholic priest, Fr. Tadeusz Isakowicz-Zaleski, plans to publish a book next month naming names of priests who collaborated -- including three active bishops. The most explosive aspect to these new revelations is how they go directly to the questions of what did John Paul know about the collaborators, and when did he know it? Did he know that men he appointed as bishops had been secret police informers back in the day? Or was John Paul kept in the dark? Or, as seems plain from his mishandling of the clerical sex abuse scandal, did he know but refuse at some level to accept it because the truth was too hard to bear? You might recall the case of the Polish archbishop, Juliusz Paetz, who resigned under pressure over allegations that he was sexually harrassing seminarians; John Paul, a personal friend, had protected him for some time, but finally was pressured by Polish church officials into relenting. John Paul apparently could not bear the ugly truth in these cases. Which is no excuse, no kind of way. Whatever the case, Fr. Zaleski is for now accepting the view that silence was kept to protect the pope. He says: "The church didn't want to hurt the pope, but actually, more harm was done by keeping silent," Father Zaleski, 50, said in an interview at the hilltop compound of a charity he runs outside Krakow. So now the Polish church is faced with having to explain why it protected known collaborators in the priesthood. To those who have followed the hierarchy's handling of the sexual abuse crisis in the US, the sequence of events laid out here by Father Zaleski will sound familiar: "The church is guilty because it had the possibility to cleanse itself by publishing honest data about the clergy's activities during the Communist time," Father Zaleski said. The church argues that coming to terms with the past is a matter of personal sin that should be handled within the church in a spirit of forgiveness. It also argues that the public disclosure of secret service files on clergy members could do the church harm because many of the documents are false or misleading. And get this: the cardinal told Father Zaleski initially to remain silent for the good of the Church: When Father Zaleski decided to begin publishing disclosures in May, Cardinal Dziwisz forbade him to do so or to speak to the press because it would undermine "love for the church and Christ." The cardinal issued an order prohibiting any member of the clergy from delving into Krakow's secret police archives without his authorization. They. Never. Learn. The fatal impulse to "protect" the public is disastrous. In fact, this is not about protecting the faithful in the least; it is all about covering the rear ends of the hierarchy. And it's all coming down now. The damnedest thing is, everybody knows that the Polish church, in the main, heroically resisted communism -- just as everybody knew that most priests in the US church were not sex abusers. But this crazy idea that people require the Church -- and its leadership -- to be spotless and perfect in every way or everything will fall apart led the bishops to make horrible decisions that are damaging the Church far worse than simply owning up to the sin and dealing with it forthrightly would have done. They have brought this entirely upon themselves. Entirely. |
||
Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution. |
||