BishopAccountability.org
|
||||
Paying for Sins The Sexual Abuse of Children Has Had an Expensive and Long-Lasting Impact on the Churches That Let It Happen or Tried to Cover It up By Jill Rowbotham The Australian October 24, 2006 http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20632680-5006787,00.html After more than a decade of damage control over the sexual abuse of children, the churches are still picking up the pieces. Spectacular revelations are few and far between these days, but look no further than the plight of Adelaide's Anglicans to see that many dioceses will go on compensating victims for years to come. In the City of Churches, Anglicans face servicing a $9 million loan that's needed to finance payouts to more than 70 alleged victims of pedophile church workers. More than 30 in that group have received $4.5million collectively after accusing former church youth worker Robert Brandenburg of abuse. Brandenburg committed suicide on the eve of his arrest in 1999. Archbishop Jeffrey Driver will oversee a lengthy program of financial recovery that will involve a 10-year levy of 1 per cent of income, to be paid by parishioners, and asset sales including the tennis court at his historic residence, worth up to $2 million, and a church camp site in the Barossa Valley.
It is not the first time churches have had to sell off their assets to make up the shortfall in funds available for payouts to victims of pedophiles: the Anglican diocese of Tasmania sold its bishop's residence for a similar purpose. In August, arguably the most notorious Anglican case was settled when Beth Heinrich was paid $100,000 in compensation for sexual abuse she claims began in 1954, perpetrated by then church warden Donald Shearman, in Forbes, NSW. She was in her mid-teens at the time and her relationship with Shearman dominated her life. Although she subsequently married and had five children, she later lived with Shearman and miscarried his baby before finally breaking away from him. Shearman, now 80, went on to become the youngest Anglican bishop in Australia, and the first to be defrocked after Heinrich's story became public. The Bishop of Bathurst, Richard Hurford, wrote Heinrich a letter in which the church apologised unreservedly for Shearman's "sexual abuse and moral corruption of a minor". But Shearman was not the only bishop to take a fall over the tragedy. Notoriously, then governor-general Peter Hollingworth, who had been archbishop of Brisbane when Heinrich first complained about Shearman in 1995, also came unstuck in the scandal. In a television interview in 2002, Hollingworth defended Shearman with the fateful words: "There was no suggestion of rape or anything like that, quite the contrary. My information is that it was the other way round." Outrage followed and Hollingworth resigned in May 2003. It was Hollingworth's second damaging controversy: the first had been a year earlier over whether he had responded adequately to victims' needs when it came to light that there had been sexual abuse at the Toowoomba Preparatory School in 1990. In December 2001, a Supreme Court jury ordered the Anglican diocese of Brisbane to pay more than $830,000 damages to a female former student of the school who had been sexually abused by the boarding master. The court case and the size of the payout left the Anglicans shaken. "That scared everybody," recalls the Sydney Anglican diocese's professional standards unit director Philip Gerber. He dates the flurry of victim claims on the churches from the mid to late '90s, triggered by the Wood royal commission into the NSW police force, which released a report on pedophilia in 1997, and to the Toowoomba and Shearman cases. Church lawyer Rodger Austin notes the rise in reporting of sexual abuse cases reflected a societal trend towards troubled people seeking counselling or family therapy. "Once they were able to talk about it to a counsellor, to acknowledge it, that changed things," he says. "Once that started to happen, people did have the courage to come forward." But although most cases may have dated from the mid-'90s, victims' groups were forming earlier than that. Broken Rites Australia dates from 1992 and opened a telephone hotline for victims in 1993, staffed by volunteers who are survivors of church-related sexual abuse. About 90 per cent of the victims who have contacted the organisation since 1993 have been from a Catholic background and more than half have been males who were abused as children. It is a problem, Gerber says, that has occurred in the vast majority of dioceses in the country, and metropolitan dioceses occasionally contribute some of the costs in settlements made by less cashed-up rural or regional parishes. For example, the Sydney and Grafton dioceses helped with the payout to Heinrich, although Bathurst bore the brunt. Although those emboldened by reports of former victims successfully holding the churches to account for its sins over previous decades have stepped forward, innocent people also have been caught up in the momentum. The best known of these is George Pell, who stood down from his role as Archbishop of Sydney in August 2002 while claims he had sexually molested a 12-year-old boy 41 years earlier were investigated. He was cleared in October that year. Pell's biographer Tess Livingstone quotes his statement from that time at length, including his reference to the ordeal as those "dark weeks", and the strength he found in "the great Christian teachings about suffering, death and resurrection". The Catholic Church made some significant payouts, including one in 2002 when the St John of God Order paid $3.6 million to 24 men with intellectual disabilities for abuse they suffered in residential care units in Melbourne. Another potential multimillion payout could be in store for the Sydney Catholic diocese if lawyer John Ellis succeeds in his claim. It hinges on abuse he alleges took place when he was a teenage altar boy in Sydney's western suburbs in the '70s. Claiming repressed memory, Ellis has mounted a civil action against the archdiocese, seeking redress against it although the alleged perpetrator, Aidan Duggan, is now dead. While churches have fought actions brought against alleged pedophile priests and religious workers in the past, it is the exception rather than the rule these days. They have also introduced or finetuned policies that enable them to adopt a methodical approach to complaints and the needs of those making them. In the Catholic Church this emerged in 1996 as the "Towards Healing" process, which is observed in every diocese except Melbourne, which has its own set of protocols. Since then more than 1000 cases have been brought to "some level of resolution", Catholic national office for professional standards executive officer Julian McDonald says. "Towards Healing does not attempt to say we give victims compensation but payments have been made in recognition of the fact that some harm has been done," McDonald says. Payments are not capped and there is no national register of how much the church has paid to aggrieved parties. The Anglicans also operate a set of professional standards units across all dioceses that manage grievances. Gerber concedes Sydney's financial strength in terms of assets and income has been a boon. "We have not had to put any particular funding aside for it," he says. Gerber estimates about 20 cases have been paid out for various sums under the scheme, but none has topped $75,000. He says ballpark figures for the financial cost to the Anglican Church in Australia to compensate for sexual abuse total about $15 million. This includes $3 million in setting up systems and processes to deal with victims and complaints, $500,000 to $1 million in counselling and meeting immediate needs such as paying bills or paying for retraining, and about $10million in legal expenses including compensation payouts. "It's tapering off now," he says of the claims. "As far as you can tell, people who wanted to raise issues in the main have done so, although others may come forward." What's happening in Australia is reflected in overseas dioceses, particularly in the US, where there is no shortage of staggering claims. In 2002 the US Catholic hierarchy held hastily convened talks with John Paul II in Rome over how to manage the worsening situation. In a society as litigious as the US, the realisation that potentially catastrophic financial implications would follow was swift. That year, the Catholic Church in Boston paid $US30 million to settle claims of abuse against one priest. In 2004 the Catholic archdiocese of Portland, Oregon, dramatically filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which effectively protected it from a $US155 million action involving 50 molestation charges against one priest. Two abuse trials had been set to begin just hours after the announcement but were halted. During the previous four years the archdiocese and its insurers had paid $US53million for the more than 100 claims, the highest per-capita payments made by any diocese. A year ago, Canada's Supreme Court ruled on a case involving tens of thousands of indigenous people who were sexually abused through many years in schools run jointly by the federal government and the churches. Its decision was that they should receive 75 per cent of their compensation from government and 25 per cent from the churches. Gerber believes payouts in Australia will never come within range of those in North America: "It's an American phenomenon; even one of our biggest cases was only $800,000. We have probably, by not being litigious, reduced the bill." Jill Rowbotham is The Australian's religious affairs writer. |
||||
Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution. |
||||