Rodimer: Psychologist Gave Me Bad Advice 
            By Maya Kremen 
              Herald News 
              March 4, 2003 
               
              The Diocese of Paterson is now placing some of the blame for an alleged 
              serial abuser on a spiritual counselor who said he was fit to return to 
            ministry. 
The Rev. Benedict Groeschel, a prominent New York Franciscan friar and 
  psychologist, treated James T. Hanley, during the 1980s, after Hanley 
  allegedly abused more than 15 boys in a Mendham parish. Groeschel said 
  at the time that Hanley's problem was alcoholism, not a tendency to abuse 
  minors, according to Marianna Thompson, the diocesan spokeswoman. 
      The diocese removed Hanley from ministry in 1986, 10 months after Mendham 
        parishioner Mark Serrano revealed that the priest abused him when he was 
        a minor. Bishop Frank J. Rodimer then allowed Hanley to serve in an Albany 
        hospital in 1987.  
      Over the past year, Rodimer has apologized numerous times for his mishandling 
        of the situation. He said he would like to see Hanley in jail. He recognized 
        in a statement that he was wrong to follow the advice given to him at 
        the time. 
      Now, through his spokeswoman, he has pointedly named the source of that 
        bad advice. 
      "'I acted upon advice given me at the time, and that advice all 
        stems from Benedict Groeschel,'" Thompson quoted the bishop as saying 
        in a private conversation.  
      Groeschel could not be reached for comment at his residence or his workplace. 
        He is the director of the Archdiocese of New York's Office of Spiritual 
        Development in Larchmont. He is also a professor of pastoral psychology 
        at St. Joseph's Seminary, and the head of the Trinity Retreat for Clergy, 
        also located in Larchmont. He is nationally renowned as a religious leader 
        and has been called by some "the male Mother Theresa" for his 
        work with poor children in Harlem. He has also counseled hundreds of priests, 
        according to a recent interview on a Catholic Web site. 
      Hanley elected to be defrocked in June 2002, after U.S. Bishops passed 
        new, harsher rules for abusive priests. He was never charged with a crime 
        because the statute of limitations for child abuse had passed by the time 
        the case was investigated. His alleged victims, who have come to be known 
        as the Mendham Survivors, are some of the most outspoken proponents of 
        the victims' movement in the country.  
      Two of the Mendham Survivors, who for months blamed Rodimer for failing 
        to control Hanley's abuse, have shifted some of their blame to Groeschel. 
        Buddy Cotton said his anger was sparked when he read an article published 
        Feb. 19 in The Metro West Daily, a Massachusetts newspaper. The article 
        quoted Groeschel saying that 98 percent of what was put forth in the media 
        about the church wasn't true.  
      "I think Groeschel's more to blame than Rodimer at this point," 
        said Cotton. "He's the person the Church turned to. Even today, he 
        has this horrific arrogance. At least Bishop Rodimer is humble and recognizes 
        that this damage was done." 
      Serrano said that he had been wary of Groeschel since the mid-1980s.  
      A few months after he filed a civil lawsuit against the diocese in the 
        spring of 1986, Serrano said, he got a phone call from Groeschel. 
      According to Serrano, Groeschel was calling to get background information 
        about Hanley, whom he was treating at the time. But Serrano also said 
        that Groeschel encouraged him to distance himself from the Hanley case. 
        Groeschel also treated the Rev. John Picardi, who was transferred from 
        Boston to Pequannock after he had been accused of raping a man. The Diocese 
        of Paterson said that it was never made aware of the accusation.  
      Boston Archdiocesan records obtained by the Herald News show that in 
        1992, shortly before Picardi was transferred, Groeschel called the Boston 
        Archdiocese to ask if the accuser was "still angry" and "still 
        in a litigious stance." Groeschel identified Picardi's problem as 
        "an acute emotional stress reaction," and indicated that he 
        "would not be surprised that within a few months (Picardi) would 
        be ready to return to active ministry," the records show. In 1995, 
        Picardi was accused of inappropriately touching a girl in Pequannock, 
        and he was transferred back to Boston. 
      The Rev. Patrick D. Browne, another priest Groeschel treated, was transferred 
        to the New York Archdiocese in the mid-1990s after allegedly having affairs 
        with two women. In New York he allegedly had an affair with a woman he 
        was counseling for marriage therapy, the archdiocesan spokesman confirmed 
        Monday. 
        
        
        
        
        
        
         |